(continued from here)
But still, why should that bother us? What is it our concern whether or not African Jews value their tribal heritage or not- isn't that their own decision to make? Should we not be honored that they have chosen us, rather than Christianity, now that they have since adopted the Biblical paradigm that we all share? With the dwindling of the Jewish birthrate worldwide, and attrition via assimilation, does adopting new members not strengthen us?
Still, Jewish tradition opposes proselytization. In that vein, I venture to say that yes, it is our concern whether Africans value their heritage or not. Don't we traditionally attempt to dissuade prospective converts, much as Naomi did to Ruth, by encouraging them to seek meaning and fulfillment in their own heritage?
There are those who claim that since the tradition against prosetylization arose as a result of centuries of anti semitism, it is outdated today. But that sentiment is not mainstream. On the contrary, centuries as targets of proselytization has made it even more distasteful to most Jews.
Kulanu itself claims that it does not proselytize, but only offers assistance to those who reach out to us (personal communication, 2000).
But is that correct? If bringing community members to America so that they can go back and teach their communities, or arranging holiday missions from other Jewish communities is not proselytization, it certainly skates perilously close. And offering financial assistance in my opinion certainly crosses that line. For Kulanu to
-fund a challa-cover-factory in sefwi,
-health care facilities, business cooperatives jewish day schools (open to non Abayudaya as well) in Uganda, offering a hebrew as well as a secular education,
-fundraise for free room and board for Igbo Remy Ilona to come study in Brandeis (the wildest dream of many an African student),
-channelling their assistance towards the general population THROUGH the abayudaya community,
creates a financial incentive for conversion, and will almost certainly promote ever more and newer devotees to "reclaim" their Jewish heritage. Individually, as a visitor in Africa, accorded celebrity status wherever I went, I felt lonely and objectified at the bevy of admirers following me, always waiting the inevitable turn in the discussion towards charity, fundraising, and somehow bringing them to the west. In the same way, on a collective level the association of my religion with material prosperity is a debasement, not an honor.
(I certainly do not oppose aid to Africa, as long as it is carried out on a non-sectarian basis in the manner of organizations such as AJWS, Ve'Ahavta and the like).
Moreover, the very visible fostering of connections between the communities with Western Jews, and the resultant status it accords them, sucks Judaism into the Christian missionary paradigm as an entry portal to the West and Westernism. Ironically, Judaism as a portal to Westernism is contrary to the motivation of liberal American Jews who reach out to the African communities specifically for the sake of multiculturalism and diversity.
(See for example http://bechollashon.jewishresearch.org/projects/research.php; this is only one of numerous sources that explicitly identify their motivations as such. This is obvious in a way; it is hard to imagine them engaging in such an enthusiastic response towards a hypothetical American Christian church that suddenly decided that it wanted to be Jewish, or bankrolling their development even if they came from rural Appalachia.)
But in reality, the practices of exporting American Jewish practice to non-Jewish communities, does not seem serve the purpose of multiculturalism but its opposite.
For example, Kulanu boutique sells Challa covers from Sefwi to assist the community. Jews who buy these may think they are purchasing authentic homemade traditional African Jewish art. I know I initially did, when during a visit to Sefwi 7 years ago, I was asked by a community leader to transport a batch of the factory-made items to the US for retail. But the leader's humorous mispronunciation of "tchalla" (with an anglicized ch as in witch) hinted that this was not his own original culture at all that he was commodifying and exporting. No- it was a foreign culture with a foreign name, that had been exported to him.
The claim that there is no proselytizing going on becomes even harder to defend, as African Judaism continues to take shape suspiciously like our own. Without detracting from their meaning and beauty, a ritualized challa cover, as well kippot so kindly donated by American Jews, are symbols specific to modern Ashkenazi Jewry. They are not biblical nor even rabbinic mitzvas. And why is Gershom Sizomu boasting (here) that "we feel we can not leave our women behind" by holding gender-egalitarian services, if not for the fact that this such a central issue in the Conservative Jewish movement which ordained him? An admireable sentiment, but isn't it a bit disingenuous to claim that no proselytization is going one, when applied to a community that only recently, within this generation, still accepted polygamy?
Certainly, there is much work to be done in the field of Jewish multiculturalism. My generation has witness the end of the only indigenous African Jewish culture with the transplant of Ethiopian Jewry to Israel, and we are currently witnessing the end of the unique Yemeni Jewish culture as the last Jews flee anti-Semitism in Yemen.The past few generations have seen an unprecedent assimilation and dissappearance of innumerable Jewish cultures, that have melted into the dominant Ashkenaz or a watered down Israeli pan-Sephardi form of practice, to say nothing of the rapid assimilation of into American Western culture. Outside of the Hasidic world, how many American Jews today speak Yiddish? Ladino? Judaeo Arabic? How many synagogues incorporate liturgy from Persia or from Caucasus? Perhaps the Jewish outreach activists would do better to search in their own backyard to protect their dissappearing heritages. It is a curious parallel between the Jewish multiculturalists and their African friends that both seek to shore up their own flagging identities, seeking it outside, in the heritage of the other.
BUT IS IT GOOD FOR THE JEWS?
(continued here)